Video game ending with room for controversy

Unfortunately, not all video game endings are perfect. Many people have not provided satisfactory feelings over the years. Most of them can be accepted, but there are some controversial things. This ending was overwhelmed by people and in some cases.

Everything about them is not bad. In fact, it could be much better if the people in the game had adjusted some of them. The following is a proposal for some of the ending and how to fix it.

Batman: Arkham Asylum

Create the final boss battle more creative

Batman is looking at a mutant joker at Batman Arkham Asylum.

Arkham Asylum is a very good game that gets almost everything correctly. Writing, story, battle, stealth and atmosphere are all fantastic. One mistake occurs at the end of the game. The last battle with Joker is a bit flat.

Batman's long -term enemies have been strengthened with Titan, and the fight with him lacks the creativity of many other fights in the series. If they improve this aspect of the game and provide better battles, it will have a greater impact on the conclusion.

I will play with the original big boss in the final mission.

Metal Gear Solid 5 Phantom Phantom Boss on Motorcycle.

Metal Gear Solid 5: When you get out of Phantom Pain, you will suddenly play the mission to play the opening level of the game. Meanwhile, you will find that a person with a bandage face who leads you during that level is a big boss. This is despite that you believe you are playing with a big boss this time. You have been playing as a medical staff who believed that they were legendary heroes. That twist alone is not a matter of all this.

The problem is that they will play the first level again. This is basically a big tutorial. It's okay for the opening mission, but it's slow and it's a flat. Perhaps they had to control Big Boss, which was at least to perform a different mission from the original.

FAR CRY 5

Let your character win a good ending

Joseph seeds look at the camera as others see during the nuclear explosion.

FAR CRY 5 is to remove the main members of the cult. At the 'Good' ending, you will lose with the leader Joseph. But when you bring him, the nuclear war begins and the bomb begins. In chaos, your car crash, your friends die, and Joseph draws you with bunkers before spraying you handcuffs. This 'end of the world' was predicted by Joseph before. Now he is not only proven to be right, but he is safe in bunkers while you are in his mercy. So he won effectively.

The villain victory is not automatically bad, but it feels very contracting in Far Cry 5. In the end, everything in the game failed and failed. Therefore, the 'good' ending feels like a 'bad' ending. There should be an additional conclusion that your efforts are rewarded.

Border

A more dangerous safe monster

Destroying from the border safe.

Borderlands plays as a safe hunter group that tracks special safes that need to include wealth. When the game is over, one of the antagonists will be held when you reach the safe. A huge monster wanders in the safe, kills others, and then fights you. Then I participate in a pretty overwhelming boss fight before seeing the final cut scene.

It is not bad to think that the monster is useful but in the safe. It can act as a wonderful twist. However, the fact that you kill the beast in a pretty easy fight makes everything temporarily temporarily. Perhaps it was more satisfactory if the safe was held at the beginning of the game and you had to prepare to fight the beast in a more narrative battle.

Nakjin 3

Use something other than radiation

Sentinel Lyons looking at the window of Fallout 3.

At the end of Fallout 3, someone must manually activate the manual water purifier. In other words, it means entering the controlling room that is radiated to kill an ordinary person immediately. Thus, you can sacrifice yourself, send others, or do nothing. For some reason, in the default game, you can't send someone who is the best choice for everyone but resisted radiation. Still, if the steel DLC is broken, create an option.

The option is more meaningful, but the ending is not good because there is no need to sacrifice others. A better option would have included non -safe non -radiation -based threats. This means that you should choose someone to be sacrificed.

Half 2

I will finish the fight

Master Chief's Halo 2 screenshot.

Halo 2 has one of Halo's best campaigns, but one of the most controversial ending. At the end of the game, the main character, the main character, Master Chief, goes beyond the ship and chases the main villain, the prophet of the truth. This is because the truth is heading to Earth to cause a lot of problems. At first, this seems to lead to the final confrontation of the game, but not.

Instead, the Admiral asks the chief of what he is doing and says, “I'm finishing this fight.” So it's a big cliff and not big. Even if he survived, it would have been more interesting and the ending to make the last battle with the truth before the end.

Fables 2

Include the appropriate final boss fight

Sparrow is holding three heroes in Fables 2 in confrontation with Lucien.

Early in FABLE 2, the Lord, called Lucien, hurt you and kills my sister. So, of course, you want a little money, and it is led by your entire adventure. Finally, you will face Lucien one -on -one. This place must be ready to get your revenge and hit the Lord. But in reality there is no real fight.

You simply use a special music box that immediately loses him, and you finish him with a bullet. It is a semi -name final battle that is not satisfactory. This game might have made you a little fight, or at least you can make something than you hold a music box.

Mass effect 3

With more ending, making choice important

Shepard holds the torso at the end of the mass.

In the first three mass effects, you need to deal with the threat of the ripper. They are synthetic forces to invade the galaxy and eliminate all the most advanced races. While dealing with them, you also make a lot of decisions that affect different characteristics and species. It is the ending of the trilogy that they do not actually affect.

In the conclusions of Mass Effect 3, you get binary choices on what REAPERS and what to do. You can destroy all synthetic creatures, control ripper, merge synthesis and organic DNA, or die with anything. Some options should be unlocked, but at least three or more options cannot be used. It is not important anyway because the main ending is not played differently. They all cause similar cuts. The way to improve the ending is to add more variations to the scene and to conclude a lot of conclusions before.

Leave a Comment