The Jurassic Park Prequel idea makes more sense than a reboot.

summation

• A Jurassic Park sequel exploring the origins of the dinosaur theme park is overdue for release.

• A prequel could address unanswered questions, such as the sudden introduction of Isla Sorna.

• Rethinking Jurassic as a horror series gives us a new perspective on the iconic character.

Not every movie or franchise needs a prequel. jurassic park It's worth it without a doubt. 3 movies each jurassic park and jurassic world When it comes to series, the franchise has no shortage of sequels and soft reboots. However, we have not yet dared to explore the birth story of the dinosaur theme park.

All films since Steven Spielberg's original work are based on Michael Crichton's novel. jurassic park It was a brief sequel following the events of the previous film. In some of these sequels lost world and fallen kingdomNew elements have been expanded into the backstory that was only briefly covered in the previous work and book.

do jurassic park Do you need the full story?

Why origin stories work

It's about time there was a sequel movie or TV series about the previous events. jurassic park. The prequel must be set when the original park is being developed or built. The original 1993 film began just as the park was about to open. It explained almost every technical aspect of how the place came to life, but didn't show the audience how it happened or what might lie beneath the surface.

And this isn't a bad thing. In fact, Spielberg's use of show-don't-tell served the film well and saved the audience from exposition or excessive exposition of the plot. However, as of now, jurassic world The following installments: fallen kingdom and control It almost feels like there isn't enough story to cover in the current timeline. Going back to the beginning might be a refreshing change for the franchise. (Unless, of course, Alex Garland proves us wrong about the coming future. rebirth movie.)

A story about potential Jurassic prequel

Site B, InGen and Hammond

potentiality jurassic park A prequel film or TV series could explore many of the ideas detailed in Michael Crichton's novel, such as the introduction of Site B and the people who helped InGen clone dinosaurs. Details like this weren't mentioned in the first film, but were dispersed throughout the sequel over time, giving us a deeper understanding of how John Hammond “spared no expense” to bring his vision to life.

Essentially, the prequel will cover the beginnings of InGen and how they cloned dinosaur DNA. It details the establishment of places like Isla Nublar, Site B, and Jurassic Park San Diego. Benjamin Lockwood was introduced much later. fallen kingdom and controlThe audience finally got to see exactly why he had a fallout with Hammond before the first park opened.

What was the background to the creation of Jurassic Park?

no way Jurassic Park 0 Next Sequel Previous

Main arguments in favor of A jurassic park or jurassic world The point of a prequel is that it takes the necessary time to explore elements that are condensed or completely missing from the book. A prequel could also explore the original discovery that led to the rest of the story, as Crichton shared in the special. The Lost World: Jurassic Park. This would work particularly well as a series, as it could lay a solid foundation for subsequent sequels in the franchise.

What happened was that I wrote a scenario about a young graduate student who had genetically engineered a dinosaur from fossil remains. And the scenario didn't work out. It was too fantastic an event to keep secret, and that's what happened in that story.

for example, lost world The introduction of Isla Sorna in 1997 was criticized because the idea of ​​a second island felt abrupt. It was introduced too suddenly in the first film without any mention of what happened to Isla Nublar. A prequel could bridge this gap and provide a stronger narrative foundation for other films to build on. It may also address unanswered questions and provide a new perspective on some iconic characters.

Main characters from the Jurassic Park prequel

Darker shades, different perspectives.

John Hammond appears as a cheerful, grandfatherly figure in the film, but in the book there is no doubt that he is a villain. A sequel could shed light on his darker side and show how he covered up more deaths than the few we know about. Plus, ideally it would include all the characters that were around to create the original. jurassic park. These included Hammond, Henry Wu, Benjamin Lockwood, and Game Warden Robert Muldoon.

More horror, less adventure

possible jurassic park The prequel needs to feel more like a horror or thriller than an adventure film. This can be achieved by showing the events that lead to certain decisions as seen in the original film. For example, the electric fence around the park is an obvious security measure, but imagine if the prequel had shown us what prompted the creation of the park in the first place. Perhaps there was an embarrassing incident.

Is it a prequel series or a complete TV reboot?

Jurassic Park: The Movie Vs. book

Actually, it doesn't necessarily have to be a prequel. There is also the possibility that it will be adapted into a full series. jurassic park It's a movie that's more accurate to the book and better suited to its fan base. This could essentially work as a second adaptation while maintaining a different flavor from the film. A suitable example would be: sand dune It has been applied to various occasions in movies and TV shows.

jurassic park It's not an ordinary movie. It is a film that has become firmly entrenched in popular culture. Most audiences across multiple generations will need no explanation as to what happened in the previous film. It's not just fun to see the first successful birth of a baby dinosaur or how Isla Nublar's iconic gates were built. jurassic park A fan's dream come true. It works without complicated setup or context.